<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Georgia Urban Forest Council &#187; Risk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gufc.org/http:/www.gufc.org/category/risk/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gufc.org</link>
	<description>Sustaining Georgia&#039;s Green Legacy by Helping Communities Grow Healthy Trees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 20:29:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
		<item>
		<title>Discussion: Potential tree failure makes for difficult decisions</title>
		<link>http://www.gufc.org/http:/www.gufc.org/discussion-potentail-tree-failure-makes-for-difficult-decisions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.gufc.org/http:/www.gufc.org/discussion-potentail-tree-failure-makes-for-difficult-decisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:29:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>gufc</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Risk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gufc.org/?p=597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Arborists are often asked to assess tree hazards on a property and are taught to look at tree health, target, and size.   Jesse Milton, in his casual research, reports that  in 38% of trees that he has observed to fail, the defect was either not visible or there was no defect.   It is no wonder that arborists [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arborists are often asked to assess tree hazards on a property and are taught to look at tree health, target, and size.   Jesse Milton, in his <a href="http://onebark.blogspot.com/2009/05/atlanta-storms-part-3.html">casual research</a>, reports that  in 38% of trees that he has observed to fail, the defect was either not visible or there was no defect.   It is no wonder that arborists often recommend to take down healthy-appearing trees near commercial and residential structures.   The decision is particularly tough when the tree is a specimen hardwood that is healthy.   To complicate matters is the bigger issue of probability; typically, it is more likely for a person to get  in a car accident than for the tree to fail.   Arborists are left with measuring the risks and rewards of leaving a tree.   Due to liability issues, these trees are typically removed.  Is this the right course of action or are there alternatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.gufc.org/http:/www.gufc.org/discussion-potentail-tree-failure-makes-for-difficult-decisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.gufc.athena.thinkhost.com @ 2010-09-06 23:50:32 -->