<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Discussion: Potential tree failure makes for difficult decisions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gufc.org/http:/www.gufc.org/discussion-potentail-tree-failure-makes-for-difficult-decisions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gufc.org/http:/www.gufc.org/discussion-potentail-tree-failure-makes-for-difficult-decisions/</link>
	<description>Sustaining Georgia&#039;s Green Legacy by Helping Communities Grow Healthy Trees</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Onebark, LLC</title>
		<link>http://www.gufc.org/http:/www.gufc.org/discussion-potentail-tree-failure-makes-for-difficult-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Onebark, LLC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 20:05:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gufc.org/?p=597#comment-9</guid>
		<description>As a clarification, the casual research I performed was in regards to tree failures during the slew of high-wind weather events in April of 2009 only.  We were seeing loading speeds of over 50 mph, which is very unusual.

Of those failures that I recorded, 67% had a defect, but only 38% had a defect that was plainly visible prior to failure.  Twenty-three percent of the failures did not have an quantifiable defect at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a clarification, the casual research I performed was in regards to tree failures during the slew of high-wind weather events in April of 2009 only.  We were seeing loading speeds of over 50 mph, which is very unusual.</p>
<p>Of those failures that I recorded, 67% had a defect, but only 38% had a defect that was plainly visible prior to failure.  Twenty-three percent of the failures did not have an quantifiable defect at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Macie</title>
		<link>http://www.gufc.org/http:/www.gufc.org/discussion-potentail-tree-failure-makes-for-difficult-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Macie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 17:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gufc.org/?p=597#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Emphasis should be placed on &quot;visual&quot;. To accurately complete the statement:  &quot;95% of the trees that fail have some type of defect which results in that failure.  Those defects may not be visable in 35% of all failures.&quot;

Decisions to remove trees should be based on the best available science, and application of a hazard rating that considers, the tree part(s), likelihood of failure, and target potential.

Ed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Emphasis should be placed on &#8220;visual&#8221;. To accurately complete the statement:  &#8220;95% of the trees that fail have some type of defect which results in that failure.  Those defects may not be visable in 35% of all failures.&#8221;</p>
<p>Decisions to remove trees should be based on the best available science, and application of a hazard rating that considers, the tree part(s), likelihood of failure, and target potential.</p>
<p>Ed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.gufc.org/http:/www.gufc.org/discussion-potentail-tree-failure-makes-for-difficult-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-7</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2009 15:36:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gufc.org/?p=597#comment-7</guid>
		<description>38% seems awfully high, in speaking with a consulting arborist in Atlanta, the number of trees he has observed with no sign of defect is closer to 5%.  Resistagraph testing might also reduce the percentage of trees where no defect was visible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>38% seems awfully high, in speaking with a consulting arborist in Atlanta, the number of trees he has observed with no sign of defect is closer to 5%.  Resistagraph testing might also reduce the percentage of trees where no defect was visible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.gufc.athena.thinkhost.com @ 2010-09-06 23:48:15 -->